Square Root Of 256 By Repeated Subtraction

Math army 2 687 views.

Square root of 256 by repeated subtraction.

Find square root of 9 by repeated subtraction method. View answer for each of the following find the least number that must be added so that the resulting number is a perfect square. Based on the fact mentioned above repetitive subtraction of odd numbers starting from 1 until n becomes 0 needs to be performed. Finding square and square roots using vedic maths duration.

First check whether the given number is a perfect square number or not. 100 1 99 99 3 96 96 5 91 91 7 84 84 9 75 75 11 64 64 13 51 51 15 36 36 17 19 19 19 0 to find the square root we subtract successive odd numbers from the number till we obtain 0. We will use this fact to find the square root of a number by repeated subtraction. To find square root we subtract consecutive odd numbers from number till we obtain 0 square root total numbers subtracted let s take an examplesuppose we need to find 81square root of 8181 1 8080 3 7777 5 7272 7 6565 9 5656 11 4545 13 3232 15 1717 17 0since aft.

Say you are required to find the square root of 121 that is 121. 9 1 8 step 2. Finding square root using repeated subtraction method duration. We know that the sum of the first n odd natural numbers is n 2.

Every square number can be expressed as a sum of successive odd natural numbers starting from 1. 8 3 5 step 3. Square root of 100. Sum of the first n odd natural numbers is equal to n 2.

Square root by repeated subtraction. Find the square root of 256 by repeated subtraction method. The count of odd numbers used in this process will give the square root of the number n. Finding the square root of a number by repeatedly subtracting successive odd numbers from the given square number till you get zero is known as repeated subtraction method.

Ex 6 3 3 find the square roots of 100 and 169 by the method of repeated subtraction. Share with your friends. 5 5 0 as you can see that given number 9 was repeatedly subtracted by successive odd numbers starting from 1 and we get zero in third step.